Mindset Shift in Cyber Pedagogy: A Teacher's Strategy upon Learning from Home
Abstract
As Covid 19 pandemic hits Indonesia, teaching-learning activities change dramatically. Learning from home becomes the only alternative in conducting distance education. From the earlier, this cyber pedagogy is assumed as an emergency step taken by the government. Consequently, teachers hold the learning process without clear objectives. Many complaints have occurred, and some improvements are proceeded to reinvent the quality of education. As a radical response toward the chaotic situation, this article is aimed at investigating two significant issues. The first is the requirement of mindset shift as the way to solve the cyber pedagogical problem. The second is the teachers' strategy in doing online learning. Theories about distance learning and quality are referred to as library research does. A descriptive qualitative approach was carried out, and in-depth interviews with parents, students, and teachers were taken. The result of the discussion is the mindset shift in teachers, parents, and stakeholders is required. The creative teachers who have good literacy in information technology are needed in running e-learning and conduct interactive learning from home.
References
Ally, M. (2011). Best Practices and Standards for e-Learning. Paper presented at 2nd International Conference on e-Learning and Distance Learning. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R. & Archer, W. (2001) Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2).
Berge, Z.L. (1995) Facilitating Computer Conferencing: recommendations from the field, Educational Technology, 15(1), 22-30.
Costa, G., & Silva, N. (2010). Knowledge versus content in e-learning: A philosophical discussion! Information Systems Frontiers, 12(4), 399-413.
Costa, G., Silva, N., & Fonseca, T. (2012). Moral reasoning in knowledge authoring: an e-learning 4.0 analysis! In S. Abramovich (Ed.), Computers in Education- Volume 1 (pp. 135--154). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for e-learning: a theory based design framework, International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-44.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
Feenberg, A. (1989) The Written World, in R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds) Mindweave: communication, computers, and distance education, 22-39. Oxford: Pergamon.
Gerstain, J. (2014). Moving from Education 1.0 Trough Education 2.0 Towards Education 3.0. Educational Technology Faculty Publications and Presentation. Department of Educational Technology.
Giannakos, M. (2010). The Evaluation of an E-learning Web-based Platform. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education. CSEDU '10. INSTICC Press, 433-438.
Glazer, R. (1998). Measuring the knower: Towards a theory of knowledge equity. California Management Review, 40, 3, 75-94.
Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Learning Networks, A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge MA. The MIT Press.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111-119.
Hase, S. (2009). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: Some challenges and opportunities. Impact: Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-learning, 1(1), 43—52.
Herring, S. (1996) Computer-mediated Communication: linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Herring, S. (1999) Interactional Coherence in CMC, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4).
Horton, W. (2006). E-Learning by Design. Jhon Wiley&Sons: Hoboken.
Kearsley, G. (2000). New Developments in Learning. http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley.
Khan, B. (2001). A framework for e_learning. Available at www. elearningmag.com/elearning/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=5163.
Kinzel, H. (2012). Industry 4.0: Where does this Leave the Human Factor? http://www.cujucr.com/downloads/Individual%20Articles/15/vol15%20Holger%20Kinzel.pdf.
Kodrat, D. D. (2020). Growth Mindset of Quality Management in an Islamic School. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, 3(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v3i1.37
Lera, E., & Mor, E. (2007). The joy of e-learning: redesigning the e-learning experience. Project PERSONAL (TIN 2006-15107- COZ-01), Barcelona.
Lukman, R., & Krajnc, M. (2012). Exploring Non-traditional Learning Methods in Virtual and Real-world Environments. International Forum of Educational & Society (IFETS). Educational Technology & Society, 15(1) 237--247.
Maison, K. B. (2007). A case for professional studies in education for teachers in higher educational institutions. In D. E. K. Amenumey (Ed.), Challenges of education in Ghana in the 21st century (pp. 248--256). Accra: Woeli Publishing Services.
Martin, E., & Webb, D. (2002). Is E-learning good learning? The ethics and equity of e-learning in higher education (pp. 49--60). Melbourne: Victoria University: Equity and Social Justice.
McVay & Rockers. (2007). Project Managing E-Learning: A Handbook for Successful Design, Delivery and Management. Routledge: Milton.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(1), 33.
Nusantara, T. (2018). Desain Pembelajaran 4.0. Forum Seminar Nasional. Lembaga Penelitian Pendidik Mandala.
O'Neil, F, & Newbold, (2008). Developing Online Learning Environments in Nursing Education. Springer Publishing Company: New York.
Omwenga, E. I; Waema, T., & Wagacha, P. W. (2004). A model for introducing and implementing e-learning for delivery of educational content within the African context, African Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), 34-46.
Saunders, S. A. (2013). The Impact of a Growth Mindset Intervention on The Reading Achievement of At-Risk Adolescent Students. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC.
Silva, N., Costa, G., Prior, M., & Rogerson, S. (2013). The Evolution of E-learning Management Systems: An Ethical Approach. In Beycioglu (Ed.), Ethical Technology Use, Policy, and Reactions in Educational Settings (pp. 93--106). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. DOI=10.4018/978-1-4666-1882-4.ch008.
Silva, N., Costa, G., Prior, M., & Rogerson, S. (2011). The evolution of E-learning Management Systems- an ethical approach. International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education, 1, 3, 12--24.
Silva, N., Rogerson, S., & Stahl, B. C. (2010). Ethicultural sensitivity in e-learning: discussing Lusíada Universities empirical findings. In Proceedings of the ETHICOMP 2010 (pp. 500--511). Tarragona. Spain.
Surry, D. W., Ensminger, D. C., & Haab, M. (2005). A model for integrating instructional technology into higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 2, 327--329. DOI=10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00461.x
Tjandrawinata. (2016). Industri 4.0: Revolusi Industri Abad ini dan Pengaruhnya pada Bidang Kesehatan dan Bioteknologi. Jurnal Medicinus, Vol 29, Nomor 1, Edisi April.
Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life Our Times. Jhon Wiley&Sons: Hoboken.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wahlster, W. (2012). Industry 4.0: From Smart Factories to Smart Products. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ presentation/50d9/785fc35f33d42258b062b 27c77b8e36ec83c.pdf.
Woodill, G. (2004). Seven trends in corporate eLearning. White paper. Operitel Corporation. Available at www.operitel.com.
Yulistiana, A. (2020). Belajar Pendidikan Abad 21 di Queensland Australia. Diomedia: Sukoharjo.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
- The Author and each co-authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution and ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors should sign copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by JKPIs prior the publication.
Author Guarantee
- The Author (Co-authors) guarantees that the Materials are an original work, submitted only to JKPIs, and have not been published previously.
- In case the Materials were written jointly with Co-authors, the Author guarantees that he/she has informed them of the terms of this Agreement and obtained their signatures or written permission to singe on their behalf.
- The Author guarantees as well that:
- The Materials do not contain libelous statements.
- The Materials do not infringe on other persons' rights (including without limitation copyrights, patent rights and the trademark right).
- The Materials do not contain facts or instructions that can cause damage or injury to third parties and their publication dose not cause the disclosure of any secret or confidential information
Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam
Published by Penerbit Sinergi Mandiri Bandung in Collaboration with Perhimpunan Intelektual Muslim Indonesia, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright ©2018 Perhimpunan Intelektual Muslim Indonesia.