Integrating Systems Thinking and Islamic Principles for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of South Papua, Indonesia

  • Sri Hidayat Department Population and Environmental Sciences, Graduate School, Makassar State University, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Firman Menne Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Bosowa University, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Lanita Winata Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Brisbane, Australia
Keywords: Sustainable development, Systems thinking approach, Systemic archetypes, Islamic principles, South Papua

Abstract

This study explores the use of a systems thinking approach to analyze the interactions between economic, social, and environmental factors in achieving sustainable development in South Papua, a newly established province in Indonesia. The research aims to address the primary issue of fragmented policy approaches that fail to account for long-term impacts and intersectoral linkages. Using a qualitative exploratory design, primary data was collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with local stakeholders, while secondary data was obtained from government reports and academic literature. Thematic analysis and causal loop diagrams (CLD) were employed to identify dynamic interactions and leverage points for policy interventions. Key findings highlight that economic growth is contingent upon sustainable natural resource management and human resource development, with feedback loops revealing the potential for synergies and trade-offs between Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). System archetypes such as "Shifting the Burden" and "Tragedy of the Commons" were identified, underscoring the need for policies that consider long-term impacts and equitable resource distribution. The integration of Islamic principles of justice and responsibility offers additional guidance for addressing these systemic challenges. The study concludes by providing holistic policy recommendations for sustainable development in South Papua, contributing both to academic literature and practical policymaking.

References

Alamsyah, I. F., & Uddin, M. N. (2024). Strategic industry in Islamic political economy perspective. Islamic Research, 7(1), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v7i1.238

Aisyah, S. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of the South Papua railway development project: A transportation infrastructure sustainability perspective. West Science Business and Management, 1(4), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v1i04.214

Ashraf, M., García, C., & Chowdhury, A. (2019). Introduction: Environment, development and sustainability. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 35(esp01), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.20937/rica.2019.35.esp01.01

Bandari, R., Moallemi, E. A., Kharrazi, A., Trogrlić, R. Š., & Bryan, B. A. (2024). Transdisciplinary approaches to local sustainability: Aligning local governance and navigating spillovers with global action towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01494-6

Center for Land Resource Management Studies, Gadjah Mada University (PS2DL UGM). (2023). Sustainable development blueprint document for South Papua Province 2023. Gadjah Mada University.

Collste, D., Pedercini, M., & Cornell, S. E. (2017). Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: Using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 921-931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3

Cai, B. (2023). Spatiotemporal dynamics in economic, social, and environmental upgrading in China: Coupling coordination and influencing factors. Sustainability, 16(1), 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010357

Chen, C., Liu, W., Chiou, I., & Liaw, S. (2011). Integrated management methodology for sustainability and land use of a river basin. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 121-126, 2789-2793. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.121-126.2789

Christawan, E. (2023). Papua as the window of Indonesia’s spirit for the Melanesian communities. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.06.03.426

Dariah, A., Mafruhat, A. Y., & Hendrakusumah, E. (2019). Framework of sustainable development planning in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1375(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012028

Grover, C., & Singh, N. (2023). Systems approach to India's SDGs. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 18(2).

Grebenyuk, V. (2013). Principles of sustainable system architecture.

Hanifah, H. S., Tenaesah, E., Fadilah, R. A., Merliyana, R. D., & Esen, A. (2024). Can poverty be eradicated? An Islamic perspective. Islamic Research, 7(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v7i1.227

Kambu, Z., Jinca, M. Y., Pallu, M., & Ramli, M. (2022). Meta synthesis of community participation model on Trans-Papua road development. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(11), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2022-08-11-08

Katina, P. F., et al. (2014). Sustainability as a prerequisite for system development through complex system coordination.

Kaya, I. (2023). A common thread for adaptive management planning of small-scale fishermen needs versus government policy in South Papua, Indonesia. Technium Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 17, 82-87. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v17i.10050

Kim, H., & Andersen, D. F. (2012). Building confidence in causal maps generated from purposive text data: Mapping transcripts of the Federal Reserve. Systems Thinking Review, 28(4), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1480

Lefaan, Y., Mollet, J. A., & Innah, H. (2021). The sustainable development in Papua based on customary territories and human development paradigm. Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 6(2), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.136.2021.62.86.96

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Moallemi, E. A., et al. (2021). Synergies and trade-offs between Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Research Letters, 16(11), 113004.

Patankar, K. (2014). Systems thinking in integrated systems for sustainable development.

Sage, A. (1997). Systems engineering and management in achieving industrial ecology and sustainable development.

Sanneh, E. (2018). Systems thinking for sustainable development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70585-9

Stijepic, D., & Wagner, H. (2017). Theoretical model of sustainable growth and economic development.

Sidiq, M. (2024). The influence of economic openness on income inequality among provinces in Indonesia. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 4(3), 1464-1467. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i3.1153

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.

Utami, W., Efendi, V., Padmalia, M., Budi, K., Prativi, D., Gozal, G., Saputra, I. T., & Wahyudi, A. (2020). Supply chain model of fresh fisheries in the waters of Fakfak, West Papua: An overview from the perspective of evaluation of performance and sustainability of supply chain. International Journal of Economics Research, 3(4), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.31580/ijer.v3i4.1537

Van, C. T. (2020). Statistical balance analysis of sustainable development systems in Vietnam.

Manoby, W. (2023). Papua special autonomy in engagement with gender, generations and deforestation: Insight from feminist political ecology. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.431-442

Wolstenholme, E. F. (2004). Using generic system archetypes to support thinking and modeling. Systems Thinking Review, 20(4), 341-356, 179-196.
Published
2024-11-01
How to Cite
Hidayat, S., Menne, F., & Winata, L. (2024). Integrating Systems Thinking and Islamic Principles for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of South Papua, Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, 7(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v7i2.330
Section
Islamic Education, Culture, and Social Interaction