Creating Plant Anatomy Structure Model using Science, Technology, Religion, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics (STREAM) Approach
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the achievement of science-technology-religion-engineering-arts-mathematics (STREAM) aspects on products made by students. The product in question is in the form of a report of a Plant Anatomy structure model project. This research uses The Static-Group Comparison Design. Purposive sampling was carried out on 39 Biology Education students of class A in semester IV with project assignments without intervention through the STREAM approach (regular class). The intervention class, 38 students of class C in semester IV with project assignments using the STREAM approach (intervention class). Each student designs and creates one of the structure models of either roots, stems, or leaves. Students also make the project report, where the project report assignment guideline is in the form of a performance task. The research instrument of this study is an analytical rubric along with a score of 0 - 4 with certain criteria and field notes. The data measured in this study is the percentage of achievement on certain criteria. The results showed that the engineering aspect was the strongest in the intervention class, reaching the "excellent" category in the intervention class of 100%. The regular class reached 64.10% with the "good" criteria in the engineering aspect. The art aspect is the weakest in both classes with varying criteria. The achievement of criteria in the intervention class showed better results than the regular class. The STREAM approach can be applied to Biology Education students through the assignment of a Plant Anatomy structure model project.
References
Agustina, T.W., Rustaman, N.Y., Riandi, & Purwianingsih W. (2019). Program Pembekalan Keterampilan Berpikir Sistem dan Kreativitas Biologi Terapan (BIORE) Menggunakan Pendekatan Science-Technology-Religion-Engineering-Arts-Mathematics (STREAM). Dissertation. Bandung: School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesian Education University.
Agustina, T.W., Rustaman N.Y., Riandi, & Purwianingsih, W. (2020). Pendekatan STREAM (Science-Technology-Religion-Engineering-Arts-Mathematics) Membekalkan Kebiasaan Berpikir Mahasiswa. Edusains, 12 (2), 283-296.
Al-karasneh, S.M., & Saleh, A.M.J. (2010). Islamic perspective of creativity: A model for teachers of social studies as leaders. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 412–426.
Amri, N.D., Rasyidi, Al., & Imran, A. (2017). Integrasi Nilai-nilai KeIslaman dalam Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA Islam Al-Ulum Terpadu Medan. Edu-Riligia, 1(4), 487-500.
Anwari, I., Yamada, S., Unno, M., Saito, T., Suwarma, I.R., Mutakinati, L. & Kumano, Y. (2015). Implementation of Authentic Learning and Assessment through STEM Education Approach to Improve Students Metacognitive Skills. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 123-136.
Basham, J.D., & Marino, M.T. (2013). Understanding STEM Education and Supporting Students Through Universal Design for Learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45, 8-15.
Bybee, R.W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. https://eric.ed.gov/ ?id=EJ898909.
Campbell, N.A., Reece, J.B., & Mitchell, L.G. (1999). Biologi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Conradty C. & Bogner, F. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the code? How creativity & motivation interact with inquiry-based learning. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 284–295.
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.
Damayanti (2019). Modul Pendalaman Pedagogik Program Profesi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam: Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pendidikan Agama Islam Kementrian Agama.
Daud, A.M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467-474.
Departemen Agama (2005). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahan. Jakarta: Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No 20 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, 1-26. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id.
Fahn, A. (1995). Anatomi Tumbuhan. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.
Firman, H. (2015). Pendidikan Sains Berbasis STEM: Konsep, Pengembangan, dan Peran Riset Pascasarjana. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA dan PKLH. Bogor, 1-9. https://www.academia.edu.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hanover Research (2011). K-12 STEM Education Overwiew. 1-20. https://www.hanoverresearch.com.
Henriksen, D. (2014), Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices, The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 1-7.
Hidayat, E.B. (1995). Anatomi Tumbuhan Berbiji. Bandung : Penerbit ITB.
Hsu. (2014). The perspective of STEM. https://perspectivestemeducation.comservices.html.
Ismail, M. (1993). Bunga Rampai Pemikiran Islam. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Ismail, S. & Shaari, M.S. (2015). Fostering Creativity in The Islamic World: Towards An Effective Islamic Creative Industry. Indian Journal of Arts, 5 (16), 111-119.
Jho, H., Hong O., & Song, J. (2016). An Analysis of STEM/STEAM Teacher Education in Korea with A Case Study of Two Schools from A Community of Practice Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1843-1862.
Kementrian Pendidikan & Kebudayaan (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)/ Madrasah Aliyah (MA). Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kementrian Pendidikan & Kebudayaan (2017). Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTs) Mata Pelajaran IPA. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan & Kebudayaan.
Kind, P.M., & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in Science Education: Perspectives and Challenges for Developing School Science. Studies in Science Education, 43(1), 1-37.
Lawson, A.E. (1994). Science Teaching and Development Thinking. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Martasyabana, I. (2017). Manjaniq dan Dabbabah di Masa Perang Thaif. https://wartapilihan.com.
Muspiroh, N. (2012). Analisis Kemampuan Generik Sains Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi Pada Praktikum Anatomi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Scientiae Educatia, 1(1),1-15.
Natsir, M. (2018). Prodi STEM masih jadi Tumpuan Pemerintah Tingkatkan SDM Indonesia. https://www.pikiranrakyat.com
Natsir,N.F.(2013). Paradigma Wahyu Memandu Ilmu dalam Pembidangan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman. https://www.uinsgd.ac.id.
Nurlenasari, N., Lidinilah, D.A.M., Nugraha, A., & Hamdu, G. (2019). Assessing 21st-century skills of the fourth-grade student in STEM learning. Journal Physic.: Conference Series, 1318, 1-7.
Oner A.T., Nite S.B., Capraro R.M., & Capraro M.M. (2016) From STEM to STEAM: Students’ Beliefs About the Use of Their Creativity. The STEAM Journal, 2(2), 1-16.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2007). The road to the 21st century: A policymaker's guide to 21st-century skills, 1-9. HTTP:// p21.org/tools-and-resources/ publications/925.
Pendidikan Biologi UIN Bandung (2016a). Kurikulum Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi. Bandung: Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.
Pendidikan Biologi UIN Bandung (2016b). Silabus Praktikum Anatomi Tumbuhan. Bandung: Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.
Poedjiadi, A. (2005 ). Pendidikan Sains dan Moral Bangsa. Bandung: Yayasan Cendrawasih.
Purwanto, N. (2003). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Ridwan, A., Rahmawati, Y. & Hadinugrahaningsih, T. (2017). STEAM Integration in Chemistry Learning for Developing 21st Century Skills. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 7(2), 184-194.
Sciencebuddies (2014). Comparing The Engineering Design Process and The Scientific Method. https://www.sciencebuddies.org.
Septiani, A. (2016). Penerapan Asesmen Kinerja Dalam Pendekatan STEM Untuk Mengungkap Keterampilan Proses Sains. Isu-Isu Kontemporer Sains, Lingkungan dan Inovasi Pembelajarannya, 654-659. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id.
Subandi, H.M. (2010). Mikrobiologi, Perkembangan, Kajian, dan Pengamatan dalam Perspektif Islam. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sumarna, A. (1981). Nilai-nilai dalam IPA’, dalam Mata Kuliah Dasar Umum Ilmu Alamiah Dasar. Bandung : Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan.
Suwarma, I. R. (2014). A Research on STEM Education Theory and Practices Method in Japan and Indonesia Using Multiple Intelligence Approach. Doctoral Thesis. Shizuoka University.
Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.
Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Dasar-dasar Untuk Praktik. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indoensia Press.
Wijaya, A.D., Karmila N., & Amalia M.R. Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics) pada Kurikulum Indonesia (2015). Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya, Universitas Padjadjaran, 85-88. https: Portal.Phys.unpad.ac.id
WMI Consortium. (2019). Irawan et al (eds.). Pengantar Wahyu Memandu Ilmu. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Yudianto, S.A. (2005). Manajemen Alam (Sains) Sumber Pendidikan Nilai. Bandung: Mughni Sejahtera.
Zainul, A. (2001). Alternative Assesment. Universitas Terbuka: Jakarta.
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19.
Zubaidah, S. (2019). STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics): Pembelajaran untuk Memberdayakan Keterampilan Abad ke-21. Conference Paper: Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Sains, Universitas Wiralodra Indramayu. 1-19. https://www.researchgate.net.
Zulaikha, S. (2019). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMPN 3 Bandar Lampung. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 83-93.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
- The Author and each co-authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution and ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors should sign copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by ISLAMIC RESEARCH prior the publication.
Author Guarantee
- The Author (Co-authors) guarantees that the Materials are an original work, submitted only to ISLAMIC RESEARCH, and have not been published previously.
- In case the Materials were written jointly with Co-authors, the Author guarantees that he/she has informed them of the terms of this Agreement and obtained their signatures or written permission to singe on their behalf.
- The Author guarantees as well that:
- The Materials do not contain libelous statements.
- The Materials do not infringe on other persons' rights (including without limitation copyrights, patent rights and the trademark right).
- The Materials do not contain facts or instructions that can cause damage or injury to third parties and their publication dose not cause the disclosure of any secret or confidential information
ISLAMIC RESEARCH is Published by Perhimpunan Intelektual Muslim Indonesia, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright ©2022.


